


![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Pssst.Kirk wrote:Yeah I was wondering about that... is that your reference model? It seems different than the one you modeled.
He wrote:http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/3908 ... big0cx.jpg Was my refrence Picture.
never ever do that.... it makes it look like your model is a cardboard box with the details drawn on. quite honestly, if you do that, it'll look like total crap.F1N3ST wrote: all the details are in the skin.
Dude. No. Do you even know who Katarn and Snaf are?They are some of the few 1337est modelers that have ever set foot in CE. =D
Ohh... The "Was my reference" part was to the right of the picture, I never saw it.GametagAeonFlux wrote:Pssst.Kirk wrote:Yeah I was wondering about that... is that your reference model? It seems different than the one you modeled.
He wrote:http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/3908 ... big0cx.jpg Was my refrence Picture.
Yea, I made this with sketchup, i need to start using max for the reasons you said. And some of it is in the skin, the part near the front isnt, i shouldve done that oh well.SnaFuBAR wrote:never ever do that.... it makes it look like your model is a cardboard box with the details drawn on. quite honestly, if you do that, it'll look like total crap.F1N3ST wrote: all the details are in the skin.
model the details. wha's the problem you see with doing that??
btw, chamfer your edges. the fact that they are straight further reinforces it looking like a cardboard box.
I'm sorry, but there is very little detail in that.Lord_FoX wrote:Depending on how much time you want to put in somthing you can achieve great detail in sketch
instance: http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f189/ ... unWIP3.jpg