Page 1 of 1
New Sig - Second Sig!
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:00 am
by jordanman615
Hey This is my second sig i followed a few tutorials and got out with this one big outcome, i think im getting the hang of maknig sigs i dunt say this one is phenomenal or even good but hey its my second sig so i would just like sum feedback thanks
Re: New Sig - Second Sig!
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:32 am
by DRL333
jordanman615 wrote:Hopefully you like this one better
Yes.
jordanman615 wrote:i think im getting the hang of maknig sigs
And yes.
It's not too bad, but keep in mind that signatures like this should have a color scheme. Everything follows a good color scheme exept the background. Try and make the background blend in more with the render.
Edit-Also size the height down to 120, 140 breaks the signature rules
.
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:14 am
by MoDFox
The text needs work and I don't like that border, try a 1px black border. Also do what DRL said.
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 11:04 am
by JK-47
What program are you using..?
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 12:21 pm
by Darkness202
needs some kind of flow and a more interesting background its just meh... it is better though
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 6:24 am
by jordanman615
Im using Adobe Photoshop CS, and ok ill change the size of them
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 11:05 am
by SHOUTrvb
Every time DRL posts I think it's 2005 and he DaRealLogan...
Anyway, the signature isn't very good. Think about what you're trying to accomplish here. Do you really want a background, render, and then 2 texts going over that render? In your case, it doesn't work. My suggestion would be to lower the height of the sig and reset the width to a proper amount giving your render some breathing room to shine in. Then decide if you even decide if you need both of those text; right now they're very crowded. Even if you keep only 1, blend them either way. You want the text to stick out, but not dominate the image. Lastly, this isn't an abstract signature, so using an ugly abstract background is only giving you an ugly image. It's a race car sig, so get a scene to match the theme. You did a fair job cutting the image. Just be sure to watch for those scratchy white areas. The back of the car looks really bad.
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 12:51 pm
by noscottno
SHOUTrvb wrote:Every time DRL posts I think it's 2005 and he DaRealLogan...
I think it's Folkluv
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 1:38 pm
by DRL333
noscottno wrote:SHOUTrvb wrote:Every time DRL posts I think it's 2005 and he DaRealLogan...
I think it's Folkluv
Yup.