Page 1 of 1
Iceman
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 11:45 pm
by DarkShallFall
Heres the original.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 11:58 pm
by JK-47
I usually just use Arial and it works fine. Downloaded fonts normally fail and kill the sig.
The sig looks really nice, though

Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 12:05 am
by JacksonCougAr
Image removed*.
wewt; win.
You win at hijacking threads. Don't do it again.
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 12:21 am
by {TP}Spartan
pwnd

Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 2:13 am
by Cuda
stocks and defaults for the Win. Try a Stylized Arial/variation of.
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 1:09 pm
by youhoo7
i wuv it... but i like cougs better =] wr is tural ???
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 9:57 pm
by maca_ยง
JK-47 wrote:I usually just use Arial and it works fine. Downloaded fonts normally fail and kill the sig.
A little part of me died when I read that..
Nice sig nonetheless, don't see much work on it though.
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:17 pm
by Dsoup
I like the original better.
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:18 pm
by Dr.Cox
Dsoup wrote:I like the original better.
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:21 pm
by JacksonCougAr
Image removed*.
wewt; win.
You win at hijacking threads. Don't do it again.
Fuck you to whoever posted that.
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:23 pm
by Munsie
A staff member?

Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:46 pm
by DemonicSandwich
The staff needs to lighten up, Jacksons image was just a joke from one friend to another.
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:13 am
by DarkShallFall
Originals better so i = phail

. Also dont bitch to staff because I personally asked for the image to be removed.
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:17 am
by JacksonCougAr
You win at hijacking threads. Don't do it again
This was a blatantly rude comment; despite being done with the request of the original thread maker. I was trying to be humorous. If you didn't want the image you should have simply PM'd me since I would have removed it if you felt it was being disrespectful, or distracting from the thread.
Saying that I was "thread-jacking" is just blowing things out of proportion.
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:24 am
by DarkShallFall
I take a half hour to make a sig. After I post it you take the time to A: make fun of it and B: disrespect it. So don't think that your post was deleted for nothing.
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:54 am
by Dr.Cox
That took you 30 Min's O.O
Most users of photo-shop could produce the same thing and can reduce the contrast and play with blending options. =\
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 1:12 am
by Kirk
Jackson: Don't continue that with new posts, when you have a complaint for something like that, just edit your original post asking the person to PM you ton continue the conversation there. Doing what you did completely derailed the thread and is offtopic now.
I think the sig is fine :/
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 1:14 am
by JacksonCougAr
I would like to point out that had the image not been removed none of this would have happened.
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 1:30 am
by ScottyGEE
The author asked for it to be removed... He has said why he wanted it gone. Staff removed it because of that. How hard is it to understand? stop posting about it. Yes you can argue that oooh it a harsh comment, it still doesn't stop it from being what it is. And look what's happened because of it too...So essentially with or without it you derailed the thread.
I actually like the sig. I say the white on the right side starts a bit too early (leaving a little too much space there).
Also, pm me or other staff if your wanting this cleaned out.
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:54 am
by DarkShallFall
Dr.Cox wrote:That took you 30 Min's O.O
Most users of photo-shop could produce the same thing and can reduce the contrast and play with blending options. =\
I don't do that many sigs and i was playing with new stuff
