Rate the sig above you.

Xero · Post by **Xero** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 2:52 pm

Please dont spam my topic rate for real or dont post at all.

L · Post by L » Mon Jan 30, 2006 3:07 pm

I cant have my opinion?

CloudStrife1100 · Post by **CloudStrife1100** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 3:28 pm

thats blueness with text, then you ACTUALLY went extra 8 feet to add a
star, how cute

'-_-

rating:
|||||||||

Xero · Post by **Xero** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 3:44 pm

lonestar88 wrote:I cant have my opinion?

I dont see why ou rate it -100 without saying anything explain why you dont like it raiting that low is like saying its pure shit crap ugly not even your sig is -100 but it isnt a 10/10.

L · Post by L » Mon Jan 30, 2006 4:02 pm

1/10 The color really ruin it, I think it should be a gray, or dark green or something, I think the render is not that good.

Skayter · Post by **Skayter** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 4:07 pm

Shows what you know.. I rate yours 1/10 no effort and ugly did u go on google for that star "Render" or did you render yourself

V0Lt4Ge · Post by **V0Lt4Ge** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 4:09 pm

7/10.

it's simple looking, yet still pretty good, like mine.

Kirk · Post by **Kirk** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 4:09 pm

Xero is right. No sig is -100/10.

Back on topic now.

GametagAeonFlux · Post by **GametagAeonFlux** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 4:09 pm

Or maybe he used the polygon tool with 5 sides (star). Or maybe he has a star custom shape.

Ketchup_Bomb · Post by **Ketchup_Bomb** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 10:47 pm

Text FTW.. we have already seen in the past how 1337 text sigs are.

G0 t3xt s1g5 4ll 7h3 w4i!1!
-_-

Rate:

Xero · Post by **Xero** » Tue Jan 31, 2006 6:51 am

8/10 i have that render also never had a chance to use it.

CloudStrife1100 · Post by **CloudStrife1100** » Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:05 am

random pink butterfly by her head....but still good BG, really good

rating:
||||||||||

-C.Paul

SurfingSpartan · Post by **SurfingSpartan** » Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:45 am

a bit simple but i like it 7/10
rate:

V0Lt4Ge · Post by **V0Lt4Ge** » Tue Jan 31, 2006 6:28 pm

not very eye-appealing, but it doesn't look half bad.

6.5/10... eh, make it 7/10.

MXC · Post by **MXC** » Tue Jan 31, 2006 6:54 pm

7/10 could use some blending with the background, but what do i know about sig makin?

trepdimeflou · Post by **trepdimeflou** » Wed Feb 01, 2006 5:04 am

New text only sig:

Vinx · Post by **Vinx** » Wed Feb 01, 2006 5:12 am

hard to read, too much goin on around the text. ill give it a 7/10 though.

my current.

MXC · Post by **MXC** » Wed Feb 01, 2006 2:30 pm

9/10

the nose looks a little too blocky

L · Post by L » Wed Feb 01, 2006 2:49 pm

Yea! a old car, from like 100 years ago! What was done in photoshop though? I dont see it? the text?
8/10

Ketchup_Bomb · Post by **Ketchup_Bomb** » Wed Feb 01, 2006 4:08 pm

Uhh, everything. I simply cut out the car and added that to one of my backgrounds. That was back in my early days of sig making.
I am surprised you still use it. It's not that great..

That is really.. unskilled art. There's nothing to it but a bunch of copy and pastes.
1/5

Rate:

HaloMods "Classic" Read-only Archive

Rate the sig above you.

Is Xero 1337?

Wow