Photograph/Wallpaper/whatever you want

bcnipod · Post by **bcnipod** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:10 am

Here is an image I took, shown it to a number of people they thought it was good, thought i, that i might want some of your input and C&C.

http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/5176/img0503dq8.jpg

if you like it and want to use it, feel free, just cite me as the creator of the image.

Sarb · Post by **Sarb** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 4:00 pm

Meh, it just looks like an average shot.

xlRainlx · Post by **xlRainlx** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 4:07 pm

pretty nice but I don't like the color of the landcape much, mostly because I hate hot weather =/

noscottno · Post by **noscottno** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:11 pm

Actually, with a little manipulation that picture could be pretty good..

Cryticfarm · Post by **Cryticfarm** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:24 pm

Yes, can I manip pl0x?

Dr.Cox · Post by **Dr.Cox** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:37 pm

It looks low-quality fo soh.

xlRainlx · Post by **xlRainlx** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 8:41 pm

I agree with the good doctor.

Cobain · Post by **Cobain** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 9:03 pm

its a nice shot i guess....i do like it =]

bcnipod · Post by **bcnipod** » Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:00 am

Dr.Cox wrote:It looks low-quality fo soh.

that might be do to imageshack, i took that on a good 6 MP camera. it is 2816x2112

crytic, like i said i do not mine, just cite me as the one that took the image.

Pepsi · Post by **Pepsi** » Sun Jan 20, 2008 5:59 am

Is there a stock that is not .jpg? I think the .jpg quality hurt this alot.

bcnipod · Post by **bcnipod** » Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:05 am

no sorry this is directly off my camera, so no better quality image.

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Sun Jan 20, 2008 3:40 pm

It's not great quality, and there's really nothing very special about it. Just a landscape photograph.

Tural · Post by **Tural** » Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:23 pm

Pepsi wrote:Is there a stock that is not .jpg? I think the .jpg quality hurt this alot.

The use of the JPG file format did not impact the visible quality of this image. Contrary to popular belief, JPG can retain quality as well as any other format; you're not going to be able to see any difference with a full quality JPG. There appears to be little to no artifacting here, the primary visible source of JPG compression, which would lead one to believe the format had nothing to do with the quality.

Veegie · Post by **Veegie** » Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:37 pm

bcnipod wrote:Here is an image I took, shown it to a number of people they thought it was good, thought i, that i might want some of your input and C&C.

http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/5176/img0503dq8.jpg

if you like it and want to use it, feel free, just cite me as the creator of the image.

If you have bracketed exposures on your camera, that would be a very nice HDR image. If properly captured.

HaloMods "Classic" Read-only Archive

Photograph/Wallpaper/whatever you want

Photograph/Wallpaper/whatever you want

Re: Photograph/Wallpaper/whatever you want