Page 3 of 4

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 11:30 am
by superaison
Yeah.


The resigner has a very cheap rehashing function. May update with a bigger one, but I doubt it. It ain't worth it.


And Veegie, if It came off that I was flaming you, I was not.


I apologize.

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 12:13 pm
by Veegie
You aren't flaming anyone, you're just annoying people.

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 12:31 pm
by unknownv2
Veegie wrote:Rehashing very large film files is often times very difficult to do.
I don't believe it has ever been automated, when speaking in regards to 10+ minute films.
Anthony and I always had to rehash the entire films by hand, which would take upwards of twenty minutes.
Well, I use Forge's resigner with my films and it works for very large films (The largest I've done is 21 mbs)

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 12:38 pm
by Veegie
Then it's a good thing that I noted that it was rehashing, not resigning that is size-dependent or I would look quite foolish.

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 12:43 pm
by unknownv2
Veegie wrote:Then it's a good thing that I noted that it was rehashing, not resigning that is size-dependent or I would look quite foolish.
Do you mean rehash independently? Because I thought you had to rehash everything you edited.

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 12:46 pm
by Veegie
unknownv2 wrote:
Veegie wrote:Then it's a good thing that I noted that it was rehashing, not resigning that is size-dependent or I would look quite foolish.
Do you mean rehash independently? Because I thought you had to rehash everything you edited.
I don't know how else that could have been perceived, but yes.

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 12:52 pm
by unknownv2
Veegie wrote:
unknownv2 wrote:
Veegie wrote:Then it's a good thing that I noted that it was rehashing, not resigning that is size-dependent or I would look quite foolish.
Do you mean rehash independently? Because I thought you had to rehash everything you edited.
I don't know how else that could have been perceived, but yes.
Well I have a program that fixes the hash tables, it worked for the 21mb film too.

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 2:57 pm
by Eaton
Been waiting for this program. :) Nice job!

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 3:10 pm
by Themandyou
Ohhh, I just got why its called Vanity!

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 5:03 pm
by Dissolution241
Very cool, thank you for posting. I like the spartan in the mirror pic.

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 6:57 pm
by snakejknight
Veegie wrote:
superaison wrote:I made one just like that.

It's completed.

but I don't plan on releasing till I release next update of forge share + h3 sav3r =]


Good job though.
No one cares about the little work you actually did.
Conflict resolution anyone? JK

Veegie i love this app... i couldn't get it to work at first but now that i have its very fun to use... So just out of curiosity is this the final version or is there more to come? (I'm just curios cuz i truly don't know if more is even possible)

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 7:49 pm
by Veegie
Nah.
Gametype and usermap extraction should be a feature shortly after I finish moving.

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:50 pm
by snakejknight
Thats cool... so wait it will be able to extract the usermap and the game type all from the video file? That would truly be awesome!

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:03 pm
by Veegie
Right.
Think of two-second video as a global screenshot.

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:19 pm
by Ragdoll
Veegie wrote:Right.
Think of two-second video as a global screenshot.
:shock:

Sounds awesome, when can we expect said update?

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:23 pm
by Veegie
Ragdoll wrote:
Veegie wrote:Right.
Think of two-second video as a global screenshot.
:shock:

Sounds awesome, when can we expect said update?
Veegie wrote:should be a feature shortly after I finish moving.

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:29 pm
by snakejknight
That would be a video preview, a map, a game, and screen shots all in one! haha nice

Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 1:42 am
by unknownv2
Cool :).

Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:29 pm
by CompKronos
Veegie wrote:Right.
Think of two-second video as a global screenshot.
just want to ask are you using something like analog film by using the data to create a screenshot(s) and then stitch them together, or am i just swinging in the breeze. =<

edit: i meant more if your application had the power to create a series of screenshots from the data then string them together,(essentially the main concept of any video so in reality stupid :cry: )

Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:40 pm
by Veegie
Yeah I didn't literally mean a screenshot...
Note the fact that I italicized it.
Your comment still doesn't make sense though, regardless of what I meant.