Rules & Regulations Summary when posting topics
-
blade22222222
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 4:57 pm
- Location: halomods duh...
- Contact:
-
tsgfilmwerks
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:18 am
This has nothing to do with cake, you jerk. I was giving a constructive idea that would only reinforce your ability to delete & lock threads. And STOP saying that my replies are irrelevant, THEY ARE NOT. It was an idea, one that you don't actually know won't work, just like I don't know it will.Tural wrote:You're trying to have your cake and eat it too.
Flaming.
But it's redundant and based on a false reality, in addition to us not needing it to justify our actions.
I never said your reply was irrelevant.
It's illogical, regardless of what either side "knows" about its outcome. Furthermore, the administration has agreed that it won't be implemented, so, as I've told you already, the answer is no, so stop arguing about it. This thread has degraded into uncivil arguments and constant reiteration of previously stated messages. The topic is closed.
Also, and this can be replied to in a PM to me, I find it humorous that someone defending the rules so much would be violating them themselves. Your signature violates two of the existing rules.
But it's redundant and based on a false reality, in addition to us not needing it to justify our actions.
I never said your reply was irrelevant.
It's illogical, regardless of what either side "knows" about its outcome. Furthermore, the administration has agreed that it won't be implemented, so, as I've told you already, the answer is no, so stop arguing about it. This thread has degraded into uncivil arguments and constant reiteration of previously stated messages. The topic is closed.
Also, and this can be replied to in a PM to me, I find it humorous that someone defending the rules so much would be violating them themselves. Your signature violates two of the existing rules.